“When a man (or woman) professes atheism, he immediately disqualifies himself to speak as a representative of science because his premise is a violation of the fundamental rule of science–”nothing created everything.””
Posted by: Joshua | 12.26.08
Is this the same Ray Comfort that concluded that a banana was a convincing argument? Ha.
By: Matt on 12.26.08
at 5:20 pm
Indeed, it is. But regardless, I do still feel that this quote makes a valid point.
By: yhoshua on 12.27.08
at 12:07 am
Not at all. All it does is indicate that Comfort has little to no understanding of science. Which would fit with everything we’ve seen of him in the past.
By: Matt on 12.27.08
at 2:22 am
Oh, come now… how can everything come from nothing?
By: yhoshua on 12.30.08
at 11:20 pm
Are you familiar with the concepts of quantum theory by any chance?
By: Matt on 1.2.09
at 8:55 pm